Halin gaggawar labarin "Zuciya na Dog." Shin, Mr. Bulgakov na zamani ne?

Tambayar da take da labarin ita ce babbar hujja. Bulgakov ya rubuta game da matsalolin har abada na ƙasar Rasha, kuma ba kawai Rasha ba. Amma za mu yi kokarin gano musamman a cikin batun, tabbatas munasaba da labari "Heart of a Dog", da kuma bayyana dalilin da ya sa wannan aiki ne ba kawai har abada, amma kuma topically.

Rushe a wannan wuri inda ya kasance shekaru 100 da suka wuce

Shahararren shahararren (zance) daga abun da ke ciki na MA Bulgakov: "Razruha ba a cikin kantuna ba, amma a cikin zukatan" ya kasance gaskiya ga yau. An wallafa labarin a 1925, kusan shekaru 100 da suka shude. Tun daga wannan lokacin, babu wani abu da ya canza. Haka ne, mutane sun fara magana akan wayoyin hannu, saƙon ya zama mai sauri. Duniya ta zama dan kadan sosai a yanar gizo, amma mutumin Rasha ya canza kadan.

Duk wannan ya sa gaggawa na labarin "The Dog Heart" ba tare da sanarwa ba.

Ko da yaya yana da haɗari ga yarda, amma yanzu akwai mutane da suka juya ƙofar wani (da kuma wani lokacin kansu) a ɗakin ajiyar jama'a, kuma ya bayyana musu cewa wannan ba kyau ba ne, babu yiwuwar, domin iyayensu ba su da kyau.

Harkokin jama'a na ilimi da al'adu (ba kawai na hankali ba, amma har ma na gida) kuma bazai ƙara ƙuri'a ba. Yara suna girma a wani lokaci ba tare da fahimtar ka'idojin rashin adalci ba. Amma ƙaramin tsara zargi ma. Iyaye sau ɗaya don farawa a cikinsu "mai kyau da haske," dole ne su sami kudi, kuma ma'anar "yaudarar" yau yau talabijin ne da Intanit. Ya bayyana a fili cewa ba za ku iya tsammanin wani abu mai kyau a nan ba. Wannan yana haifar da "lalata a cikin zukatan". Wani mawuyacin amsar tambaya game da gaggawar labarin "Zuciya ta Dog".

Cult "Artist" a matsayin babban alama na cutar na lokaci

Rahotanni sun haɓaka a kan MUZ-TV da MTV sun girma tare da tabbacin cewa kasancewa dan wasan kwaikwayo, dan rawa, mai kiɗa ne "mai sanyi", da sauran ayyukan "tsotsa". Harshen Soviet: "Dukkan ayyukan da ke da muhimmanci, ana buƙatar dukkanin sana'ata" - ya raguwa. A wasu kalmomi, lokaci ya zo, lokacin da kowa yana son kawai ya yi nishaɗi da raye-raye - "raira waƙoƙi", maimakon aiki. Mutane sun yi imanin cewa duniya tana da yawa, kuma, bisa ga wannan mahimmanci, akwai wanda zai ci gaba da yin aiki na kwarai a cikin sana'a ba dangantaka da kerawa ba. A wasu kalmomi: "Wani, amma ba ni ba."

F. F. Preobrazhensky yayi magana akan wannan yanayin? Har ila yau, mai karatu ya tambayi kansa tambayar game da gaggawar wannan labarin "Zuciya ta Dog"?

Babu wani abu da ba daidai ba tare da ba da zarafi ga '' 'yan mata da' yan mata '' su shiga cikin 'yan wasan Olympus. Amma saboda wani dalili, yana da alama cewa hakikanin abin basira abu ne mai ban sha'awa, kuma nau'o'in nau'i na gaskiya suna nuna alamar rashin adalci, ilmantar da wani ɗalibai na 'yan kasuwa da' yan jari-hujja wadanda ba su damu da kasar ba, suna da sha'awar dukiya kawai. Abu daya ne lokacin da mutane suka samu nasara, kuma wani abu kuma, idan sun yi watsi da shi a cikin babban taro. Hakika, yin waƙa bayan wasan kwaikwayon a talabijin na gidajen cin abinci - ba motoci ba, amma babu wata ma'ana a cikin dinari.

Game da wannan, wata hanya ko wani ya yi magana da F.F. Preobrazhensky: Mutumin Rasha yana shan wuya daga gaskiyar cewa a cikin tunaninsa na zamantakewa (kuma, a cikin rayuwarsa) babu ma'ana, amma yana da jinkiri don ba ta kanta, yana da sauƙi a gare shi ya urinate a gaba. Jirgin yana kara (ko bincika rayuwarka). Tun daga wannan lokacin, rashin alheri, kadan ya canza, kuma yana kawar da tambaya game da muhimmancin labarin "Dog Heart" a zamaninmu.

A maimakon "ball" da "shvonder" ya zo "mabukaci"

Kuma har yanzu ba a bayyana irin abin da ya faru ba. Tabbas, "mabukaci" ya fi al'ada, mafi sauki, amma yana sa duniya ta razana don wasu dalilai fiye da "shvonder" da "ball". A matsayinka na mai mulkin, "mabukaci" ba a koya ba, amma yana da dukkan ra'ayoyinsa: game da manyan fasaha, kyawawan dabi'u, wallafe-wallafe. Yana sarrafa kwafin kuɗi da duk wani gudana. A cikin duniyar da yawancin batun ke nunawa, "mabukaci" yake kula da komai, saboda shi ne mafi rinjaye cikin jiki. Bulgakov da aka yi la'akari da aikinsa a matsayin babban nau'i, wanda a cikin karni na 20 yayi ambaliya a Turai, kuma a cikin 21-m ya isa Rasha. Shin yana da kyau a tambayi kanka, menene gaggawar labarin "Dog Heart" a zamaninmu?

A 1930, littafi na al'adun José Ortega y Gasset "The Rise of Masses" ya buga. A cikin wannan, ya bincika dalla-dalla game da batun "wani mutum". Daga cikin wadansu abubuwa, ya rubuta a cikin rubutunsa: "Mutumin (mai siyayya) yana jin dadin kansa kuma yayi la'akari da kansa kansa." Amma abu shine cewa wannan bambance ne game da fahimtar mabukaci ba, shi ne ya zama maƙarƙashiyar rayuwa. An gina dukan wayewar zamani don bukatunta.

Shin mutum yana fushi ko mai kirki? Ra'ayin Bulgakov

Bulgakov yana jin dadi game da yanayin mutum. Ba a banza ba, ya bambanta a cikin labarin "dabba mai kyau" da "mugunta" mutum. Akwai mai kyau kare, ya zama mara kyau mutum. Abin mamaki ne ba sauyawar Sharik zuwa Sharikov ba, amma gaskiyar cewa Philip Philipovich, saninsa game da lalacewar, har yanzu ya yanke shawara a kan gwajin gwaji.

"Rashanci Frankenstein" ba wai kawai ya kasa tabbatar da fatawar mahaliccin ba, amma bari yakin Soviet ya zama gaskiya tare da dukan abin banƙyama a cikin zaman lafiya da jin dadi na farfesa. Ga Bulgakov a ciki babu wani fara'a kuma babu wani sashi - daya datti.

Kuma idan sakamakon gwajin Bulgarus ya kasance a cikin tsari guda ɗaya, to, zai kasance: "Kyakkyawan kare yana da kyau fiye da mutum mara kyau." Kamar yadda alama, a karkashin wannan ra'ayin biyan kuɗi zuwa da yawa mutane a yau, shi ke taka a cikin hannãyenku daga cikin Rasha litattafansu a amsa wannan tambaya na abin da yake cikin munasaba da labari Bulgakov ta "Heart of a Dog."

A ƙarshe, ina so in faɗi abu guda kawai, bin misalin I. Volgin: "Karanta kuma ka sake karanta tsofaffi, suna bayyana sabon ma'anar sabbin kalmomi a ciki."